If you've ever walked through a city, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.
The smaller ones are being replaced by larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. safe distance to live from cell phone tower for exposure are based on research which show that the energy of RF could cause harm to health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body parts. This can lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and not exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
In the event that you've used mobile phone, then you've probably realized that the safest range from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of the transmission of cell towers increases drastically the further the tower is.
While it sounds like a good idea, the reality is that those living close to towers may actually be more prone to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that those who lived within 50m of cell towers had significant more health issues than those who were far from antennas.
However, what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a few days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.
This is because the RF radiation used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin acts as a shield against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. It is also the most important organ in the human body, and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. They include the incorrect belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of the modulated RF signal, as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of radiation exposure. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. https://www.theversed.com/members/crackfaucet1/activity/3549029/ of RF radiation and other environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This could result in an increased risk of negative health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.