If you've ever been through a city and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data which prove that electromagnetic energy can cause harm to health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one Gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This can result in various potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Because of the potentially negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, and never to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
In the event that you've used cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe range from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the further you are from it.
While it sounds like something that's good, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers could be more prone to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who lived farther away from the antennas.
This study revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.
safe distance to live from cell phone tower is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the largest organ in the human body, and is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. what is a safe distance from a cell tower include the erroneous belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).
This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure guidelines.
Furthermore to what is a safe distance from a cell tower , ICNIRP and FCC limit the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs, based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of radiation exposure. In particular it is inconclusive for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.