If you've ever wandered through a city and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.
what is a safe distance from a cell tower are replacing the larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible, they still can create issues for users.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on scientific data which prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to human health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a gram of tissue.
Since what is a safe distance from a cell tower is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to create more energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This can result in many potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, but not exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
In the event that you've used cell phone, you probably know that a safe range from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is because the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the farther the tower is.
While it sounds like something that's good but the truth is that people who live close to towers could be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those who were distance from them.
But, the study revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.
This is because radiofrequency radiation, utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the largest organ of the human body. what is a safe distance from a cell tower is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. This includes the false belief that exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption also ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the effect on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This would result in the risk of having adverse health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.