If you've ever walked through a town and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.
These smaller towers are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. While what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data that show that RF energy can cause harm to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one kilogram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This could lead to various possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases such as dermatitis and skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general maximum power density of four mW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever operated a cell phone, then you're aware that the safest location from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is due to the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the further away the tower is.
Although this may sound like an ideal idea, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers might be more susceptible to health issues. For what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower , a 2014 study in India found that residents living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who were far from antennas.
But, the study found that people who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.
This is because RF radiation, used in wireless communication, can penetrate the body's outer layer of skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a shield against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. Additionally, safe distance to live from cell phone tower is the most important organ in the human body, and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption is also ignoring the greater penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals, as well as the effect of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.
Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit their limit of exposure to the local SARs that are based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.
