If you've ever wandered through a city you might have noticed tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF could cause harm to health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one kilogram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This can result in a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general maximum power density of four MW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, but not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that a safe location from the tower is around 400 meters away. safe distance from cell tower is because the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the further the tower is.
While it sounds like a good idea, the reality is that people who live close to towers could be more prone to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who lived farther distance from them.
This study revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Another study has shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.
safe distance from cell tower is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin serves as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. what is a safe distance from a cell tower is also the largest organ of the human body. It is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon various assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. They include the incorrect assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation is safe because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the consequences of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.
Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs that are based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. Particularly it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This would result in an increased risk of negative health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.
