If you've ever wandered through a city and spotted tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.
The smaller ones are being replaced by larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can cause problems for people.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research which prove that electromagnetic energy can cause harm to health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. what is a safe distance from a cell tower 's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a kilogram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This could lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
In the event that you've used cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe location from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is due to the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the further your location from the tower.
While it sounds like something that's good however, people living in close proximity to towers might be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those living further far from antennas.
But, the study revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a few days. Another study has shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the most important organ in the human body. It is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false belief that short-term exposures RF radiation is safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
The assumption also ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals and the effect of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. As such, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower with co-exposure to other environmental agents such as sunlight. In http://needlesnake8.xtgem.com/__xt_blog/__xtblog_entry/__xtblog_entry/33974747-how-far-should-i-remain-coming-from-a-5g-mobile-tower?__xtblog_block_id=1#xt_blog of interactions, RF radiation with other environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.