If you've ever been through a town you might have noticed tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
They are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research that prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to human health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a Gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This can lead to various possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Because of the potentially negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general maximum power density of four mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
https://livingwellcenters.org/members/alloynews8/activity/159402/
If you've ever operated a cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe location from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the further you are from it.
While it sounds like an ideal idea however, people who live close to towers might be more prone to health problems. For what is a safe distance from a cell tower , a study from 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers had significant more health issues than those who lived farther far from antennas.
This study found that people who moved to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is utilized for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. Go to the website is important to understand since the skin functions as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. The skin is the most important organ in the human body. It is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on several assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. They include the false belief that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption is also ignoring the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be used for health protective exposure guidelines.
Additionally to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum limit of exposure to the local SARs based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This would result in the risk of having adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.