Very best safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower?

· 3 min read
Very best safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower?

If you've ever walked through a town and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.

They are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds


The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF could cause harm to health.

The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a kilogram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This can lead to various possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

In the event that you've used cell phone, you probably know that the safest distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is because the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the farther your location from the tower.

While it sounds like something that's good but the truth is that those living close to towers might be more prone to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that those who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those who were distance from them.

But,  what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower  found that people who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.

This is because RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communications, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ of the human body and is accountable for protecting other organs.
Click to find out more  on many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. These include the erroneous belief that exposures to RF radiation is safe because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e., tissue heating).

The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the effects of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. As  what is a safe distance from a cell tower , they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.

In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC are limiting the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs, based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of radiation exposure. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.