If you've ever wandered through a city, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger built cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
safe distance from cell tower is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data that show that RF energy can cause harm to health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This could lead to many potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general maximum power density of four MW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower for Maximum Exposure
Have you ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that the safest location from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the farther you are from it.
While this sounds like an ideal idea, the reality is that those living close to towers could be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that those who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who were far from antennas.
This study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Another study has shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.
This is because the RF radiation used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, which is the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the largest organ of the human body, and is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. https://etextpad.com/ include the erroneous belief that exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the effects of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.
Furthermore, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs, based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This would result in an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.