Are usually safest distance from a 5G cell System?

· 3 min read
Are usually safest distance from a 5G cell System?

If you've ever been through a town, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.

These smaller towers are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. While  what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower , they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research that show that RF energy can cause harm to health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a Gram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body areas. This can lead to many potential problems, including an increased appearance of skin disorders like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.

Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

Have you ever used a cell phone, you probably know that the safest distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is because the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the further you are from it.

While it sounds like something that's good, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers could be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered much more health problems than those living further away from the antennas.

This study found that people who moved to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors as well as other health issues.



This is due to the fact that the RF radiation utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, the skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ in the human body, and is accountable for protecting other organs.
https://waugh-horne.mdwrite.net/very-best-safest-distance-coming-from-a-5g-cell-tower-system-1682547358  for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. They include the incorrect belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

safe distance to live from cell phone tower  ignores the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals and the consequences of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure guidelines.

In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.