If you've ever walked through a city, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.
They are replacing larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data that show that RF energy could be harmful to human health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one kilogram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This can result in many potential harms, including exacerbated the development of skin conditions such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Because of the potentially negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, and not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a cell phone, then you've probably realized that a safe location from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the farther your location from the tower.
While it sounds like an ideal idea, the reality is that people who live close to towers could be more prone to health problems. For what is a safe distance from a cell tower , a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those living further far from antennas.
But, the study found that people who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Other studies have demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that the RF radiation used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, which is the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. safe distance from cell tower is also the most important organ in the human body, and is accountable for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. They include the incorrect belief that exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to the limited absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
This also overlooks the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. As such, they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.
Additionally to that, ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In safe distance from cell tower , psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.