Are usually safest distance coming from a 5G cell Structure?

· 3 min read
Are usually safest distance coming from a 5G cell Structure?

If you've ever been through a town and spotted tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

These smaller towers are replacing the larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could cause issues for users.
The of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a Gram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts.  safe distance to live from cell phone tower  could result in a wide range of possible harms, like the appearance of skin conditions like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.


Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, but not exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever operated a cell phone, you probably know that the safest distance from the tower is around 400 meters.  what is a safe distance from a cell tower  is due to the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the further you are from it.

While it sounds like something that's good but the truth is that people who live close to towers might be more prone to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered much more health problems than those who were far from antennas.

However, this study also showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days.  https://etextpad.com/  has revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.

This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used for wireless communication, has the ability to be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is vital to be aware of this since the skin functions as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. It is also the biggest organ of the human body and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the effects on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.

Furthermore, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict their exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.